New Delhi: The Supreme Court has rejected a plea by Tushar Gandhi, great-grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, against the redevelopment of the Sabarmati Ashram in Gujarat. The court dismissed the petition, citing the long delay in filing it—over two and a half years after the Gujarat High Court’s order.
The Controversy
The Gujarat government has planned a ₹1,200 crore redevelopment of the historic Sabarmati Ashram. Tushar Gandhi opposed the project, arguing that it would alter the ashram’s original design and require the demolition of around 200 surrounding buildings.
He also claimed the project violated the Constitution. He cited Article 39, which prevents wealth concentration, and Article 49, which protects national heritage sites.
High Court and Supreme Court Stand
The Gujarat High Court had earlier dismissed the plea. It accepted the state government’s assurance that the ashram’s existing structure would not be disturbed. The court also believed the project would help promote Gandhi’s ideals.
The Supreme Court agreed with the High Court’s view and refused to intervene.
Tushar Gandhi’s Argument
Tushar Gandhi argued that Mahatma Gandhi designed the ashram to reflect simplicity, self-sufficiency, and harmony with nature. He claimed the redevelopment threatened its dignity and legacy.
He also said spending public money on such a project, instead of humanitarian causes, went against Gandhi’s principles.
With the Supreme Court’s decision, the Gujarat government can now proceed with its redevelopment plan.
