Prayagraj: The Allahabad High Court said live-in relationships lack social acceptance. It stressed the need for a framework to protect moral values. The court made these remarks while granting bail to a Varanasi man accused of deception in a live-in relationship.
Justice Nalin Kumar Srivastava heard the bail plea of Akash Keshari. He was booked under multiple IPC sections and the SC/ST Act. A woman accused him of refusing marriage after six years of cohabitation. She filed a complaint at Sarnath Police Station, Varanasi. She claimed he had physical relations with her on the pretext of marriage.
“Live-in relationships have no social sanction. Youths are attracted to them because they can easily escape responsibility. Their popularity is increasing,” Justice Srivastava observed.
The court added, “We must find a framework to protect moral values.” The judiciary is concerned about the legal and moral impact of live-in relationships.
Keshari’s lawyer argued that the prosecution’s claims were false. He said the relationship was consensual. The woman was an adult and had lived with Keshari willingly for six years. He denied any abortion occurred. He also said Keshari never promised marriage.
The High Court granted bail to Keshari. It emphasized the need for legal clarity in live-in relationships. While it avoided personal judgment, it stressed balancing social values with legal rights.
The court’s remarks reignite debates on live-in relationships in India. The Supreme Court has recognized them under the right to life and liberty. But society remains hesitant. The increasing trend challenges traditional norms, fueling discussions on law and morality.
Legal experts say a structured approach is needed. This would protect individuals’ rights while addressing social concerns.
